Patient safety

International care creates real opportunities, and real risks. The project should proceed only if continuity and patient safety can be designed properly.

In an emergency in Québec, call 911 or seek local emergency care.

  • No patient should travel for treatment solely because of commercial pressure.
  • Clinical eligibility must be determined by qualified healthcare professionals.
  • International treatment requires an explicit plan for complications and continuity of care.

Pre-travel assessment

Clinical eligibility belongs to qualified professionals, not to the company.

Fitness to travel

An unstable patient, or someone recently operated without a favorable opinion, should not fly.

Medication reconciliation

The medication list, allergies, and anticoagulants must travel with the file, in a language the team understands.

Infection risk

Prevention protocols belong to the institution. We do not replace them.

Thrombosis risk

Long-haul travel and surgery add a risk that the treating physician and the Brazilian team must name before departure.

Post-operative travel

The return date is not a commercial argument. It depends on clinical advice and fitness to fly.

Return plan

Who reviews the patient, with which documents, and on what timeline: those questions come before treatment.

Complication plan

What to do at night, in Brazil and then in Québec, and who can be reached. Without that plan, the file should not move forward.

Access to records

The patient should be able to obtain a discharge record in a format usable by professionals in Québec.

Emergency contacts

Contacts for the treating team, the institution, and a person in Québec, recorded before departure.

Follow-up plan

Suggested follow-up is clinical information from the institution. It does not obligate the Québec physician.

Insurance questions

Private care abroad is generally not covered by the public plan. The patient checks coverage before committing. We do not sell insurance.

What could make this model fail

  • Inadequate follow-up after return
  • Poor hospital selection
  • Excessive or opaque prices
  • Insufficient patient education
  • Weak privacy controls
  • Complications after return without a clear plan
  • Unclear responsibility
  • Commercial pressure
  • Inappropriate patient selection

Risk register

  • Post-operative complication after return to Québec

    Probability: Medium · Impact: High

    Written complication plan before departure. Structured discharge record. The Québec physician is never obligated to assume follow-up.

    Treating institution + patient · In design

  • Patient not fit to fly

    Probability: Medium · Impact: High

    No travel without a fitness-to-travel assessment by a qualified professional. Postpone or cancel if the condition changes.

    Clinical professionals · In design

  • Inadequate medical documentation

    Probability: High · Impact: High

    Minimum document list before transmission. No hospital review starts on an incomplete file.

    Coordination + patient · In design

  • Communication breakdown between teams

    Probability: Medium · Impact: High

    Named channel, stated language, and physician-to-physician contact when both sides agree.

    Coordination · Open

  • Inconsistent hospital quality

    Probability: Medium · Impact: High

    Written criteria before any discussion. No exclusivity. Exit if continuity expectations are not met.

    Project leadership · In design

  • Privacy breach or record leak

    Probability: Low · Impact: High

    No real records in this prototype. Launch only after legal review, consent, encryption, and access logs.

    Privacy lead · In design

  • Misleading advertising or outcome promises

    Probability: Medium · Impact: High

    No promises of timing, final price, or clinical outcome. Copy review before publication.

    Leadership + legal counsel · Watch

  • The patient believes the company practices medicine

    Probability: High · Impact: High

    Repeated statement: no diagnosis, no treatment recommendation. Consent that separates coordination from clinical judgment.

    Coordination · Watch

  • Travel disruption

    Probability: Medium · Impact: Medium

    Travel is booked by the patient or a licensed travel provider. Coordination does not sell tickets.

    Patient / travel provider · Open

  • Currency fluctuations

    Probability: High · Impact: Medium

    Hospital estimates stay with the institution, in its currency, with a validity date.

    Institution + patient · Watch

  • Hospital estimate differs from the final invoice

    Probability: High · Impact: High

    The patient pays the hospital directly. Any clinical or price revision comes from the institution, in writing.

    Institution · Open

  • Québec follow-up unavailable on return

    Probability: Medium · Impact: High

    Continuity is discussed before treatment. If no return plan exists, the file should not proceed.

    Patient + professionals · In design

  • Emergency before travel

    Probability: Low · Impact: High

    In Québec, call 911. The project does not redirect emergencies.

    Local emergency services · Watch

  • The patient believes the company recommended surgery

    Probability: Medium · Impact: High

    The clinical proposal is issued by the institution. Our materials do not select a procedure.

    Institution · Watch

  • Conflict of interest from hospital compensation

    Probability: Medium · Impact: High

    No per-surgery commission. Medical recommendations must never depend on our compensation.

    Leadership + ethics · In design

  • Language misunderstanding

    Probability: High · Impact: High

    Administrative language support. Important clinical documents are translated by qualified people, not by a tool alone.

    Coordination · Open

  • Missing implant or device documentation

    Probability: Medium · Impact: High

    The discharge package includes device identification, lot, and surgeon contact details.

    Treating institution · In design